ubN0HMjdgQ

Strop sudden failure of a hotel located in Changchun citizen TUNG dropped from three meters high when playing a strop, leading to right tibia and fibula fractures, identified as ten disabled. He claims nearly 20 million for the hotel. The hotel argued that the use of whips,nLhnBN5SmT, is an individual behavior, should compensate the injured without permission. TUNG the hotel to court.
 
March 13, the court sentenced the case, the hotel should compensate the injured 13 million yuan. Changchun City Consumers Association official also went to the scene to attend.
 
The people at the hotel playing strop fall victim claims nearly 20 million fractures
 
TUNG 40 years old this year,O4kQCaJy4x, last August 27 at noon, to celebrate the children go to college, he went to a restaurant to book a private room.
 
"I've also been to,Louboutin Talon Compensé, here are available for customers free play of recreational facilities, including a slippery rope,WWmpHmcF2T, previously played." He said, and others in the process, he played strop. As a result, whips fails, he hovers over the cableway, the results fall from 2.3 meters injuries. After being sent to Kyrgyzstan freshman hospital diagnosis,Louboutin Souliers Plat, the right tibia and fibula fractures. After surgery, he was discharged on September 24 last year.
 
He said the falls, brought him suffering physical and psychological. Even now, still not working.
 
Mr Tung said after the incident, the family and the hotel several rounds of consultations the matter,K2k2Jz161Q,Louboutin Escarpins,, but did not give any compensation hotel party. In his view, the hotel offers a strop should be timely maintenance, malfunction caused his fall, should give the relevant compensation. He entrusted his wife sued the hotel.
 
After forensic identification, he falls constitute ten disabled, follow-up treatment costs about 19,000 yuan, a loss for the period after discharge five months after injury. Since then the two sides repeatedly unsuccessful negotiations, Mr TUNG claims for the loss of a total of 194,938.66 yuan to the hotel, including medical expenses, care, lost wages, hospital food subsidies, transportation costs, disability compensation, solatium, follow-up treatment fees.
 
Hotel injured party is an individual behavior are not compensable hotel
 
13 pm verdict, the plaintiff and the defendant in court by an agent.
 
Hotel party argues that no objection to the incident, but the plaintiff was not injured in the restaurants defendant, is it in the case of unauthorized use of the case of the hotel staff to expand the training equipment for the injured,, belonging to his personal behavior,Louboutin Plates-forme, nothing to do with the defendant, the defendant does not assume any liability.
 
The trial, accused of expert opinion also disagree, but the defendant did not submit a written application to the court to re-identify. The defendant also provided photographic evidence,Louboutin Mary Jane, showing the surrounding stands a strop warning signs, displays whips accused expand training only.
 
But to deny the existence of the plaintiffs identified in the event of an accident.
 
Court case of catering contract dispute a compensation of 13 million yuan hotel
 
South Gate District, Changchun City People's Court court held that the plaintiff ordering the defendant, the defendant also agreed dining plaintiff, the plaintiff agreed by the parties to reach the defendant to wait to eat, the two sides reached consensus on the food service. According to the food and beverage industry trading habits,Mx62NqDS06, the plaintiff accused Mr Tung on arrival at the two sides had set up catering contractual relationship, and the contract has taken effect, the defendant has to provide quality, safe food service contractual obligations, as well as to protect the personal safety of the plaintiff's contract obligations.
 
Whether or not there at the time of the accident warning signs, as consumers plaintiff unimpeded use of the whip and injured objectively, so the defendant failed to fulfill its contractual obligations to protect the personal security; the defendant as operator, should provide security for consumers goods and services,, cableway established within the premises defendant, the defendant bears the ropeway management, maintenance obligations, the defendant failed to fulfill its contractual obligation of security, resulting in the use of lifts injured plaintiff in the absence of any protective measures, the defendant should bear liability.
 
About plaintiff claims compensation for mental solatium and agency fees are not contractual liability, the plaintiff did not provide evidence that expenditure transportation costs due to injury, these three will not support.
 
13 afternoon, the court was ruling on the case, the defendant should immediately compensate the plaintiff economic losses 137,114.54 yuan. Case acceptance fee of 4199 yuan, 1246 yuan burden on the plaintiff, the defendant the burden of 2,953 yuan.
 
After the verdict, the plaintiffs said, basically satisfied, whether the appeal must also be considered. The defendant claimed that, as an agent, the need for further consultations with the parties.
 
New Culture Reporter Peng Hongsheng
 
Edit: SN064